Steepest collapse
China: 7.5 → 0.95
Fertility is down 87% from its 1963 peak of 7.5 children per woman.
Compare
Up to eight countries, as far back as 1800. Hover or tap the chart for exact values and sources.
Start here
Patterns pulled straight from the data. Open any of them in the explorer, or share it.
Steepest collapse
Fertility is down 87% from its 1963 peak of 7.5 children per woman.
Same start, different fate
Both had about 6.0 children per woman in 1970. Now Central African Republic is at 6.0 and Vietnam at 1.9.
Faster than the models
National statistics put fertility at 1.8 in 2024. The World Bank's modelled series still reads 2.5 for 2024.
Halved in record time
From 6.1 children per woman in 1970 to 2.8 in 1977.
Against the tide
Fertility bottomed out at 2.3 in 2012 and has risen since, while most of the world kept falling.
Newest below replacement
Lowest on Earth
Highest on Earth
Map
Press play to run from 1950 to today. Green is above replacement, red below. Click a country to bring it into the comparison.
The great convergence
Each bubble is a country, sized by population. In 1950 they spread from 2 to 8. Play the years and watch them crowd below replacement.
Milestones
The first year fertility fell below the line, counting from 1950. Hollow names have since climbed back above it.
Rankings
Sort by level or by speed of change. Click a name to chart it, or add it to your comparison.
Go deeper
Fertility by group, by region inside countries, and the newest monthly births.
The total fertility rate (TFR) is the number of children a woman would have over her life if she experienced this year's birth rates at every age. A TFR of about 2.1 keeps a population the same size from one generation to the next, before migration. Values from 1960 are World Bank estimates; earlier values are reconstructions from the Human Fertility Database, UN estimates for 1950–59, and Gapminder's modelled series further back. The newest years use provisional national statistics where they line up with the World Bank series, and show them separately where they don't. Methodology