πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ Japan briefing

Why it matters, neighbors, workers versus retirees. Generate a draft, write it yourself, then expand or edit any paragraph.

A memo you can forward: why fertility matters, how this country compares with its neighbors, and how many working-age people versus retirees the pyramid already implies. Tick sections, park each chart next to the paragraph it belongs with, then generate β€” or start from blank headings and write it yourself. After that, every heading and paragraph is editable, and Expand / Tighten / Ask AI can rewrite one section at a time.

Japan is the textbook ultra-low, ultra-aged case: the 2040 workforce is mostly already born.

Sections
Charts β€” order and placement

Children per woman, Japan and neighbors

children per woman
TFR

Total fertility rate, Japan

children per woman

Population share by religion

% of population

Age pyramid, Japan

2025 Β· male (left) / female (right)

people
World Bank population by age and sex. Open full pyramidbirthrate.io

Working-age and retirees, Japan

millions of people
Working age (15–64)Age 65+

Net migration, Japan

people

Foreign-born stock by origin, Japan

people

Japan-born living abroad

people

Health expenditure, Japan

% of GDP

Age-dependency ratio, Japan

%

Share aged 65+, Japan

%

AI prose uses the same OpenAI key as Cohort β€” add billing credits at platform.openai.com if generate or Expand fails. Limited to a few memos per hour. You can always type over the text.

This briefing will cover

  • TFR has been far below replacement for decades; the pyramid is the exhibit.
  • Immigration is small relative to the gap. That is arithmetic, not a verdict on whether inflows should rise.
  • Prefecture maps show Tokyo versus the rest.

Working-age counts are modeled from today’s pyramid. 2040 taxpayers are mostly already born; TFR shows up around 2060.