🇮🇳 India briefing

Why it matters, neighbors, workers versus retirees. Generate a draft, write it yourself, then expand or edit any paragraph.

A memo you can forward: why fertility matters, how this country compares with its neighbors, and how many working-age people versus retirees the pyramid already implies. Tick sections, park each chart next to the paragraph it belongs with, then generate — or start from blank headings and write it yourself. After that, every heading and paragraph is editable, and Expand / Tighten / Ask AI can rewrite one section at a time.

India is already below replacement in NFHS-5, but religion and state maps still decide which India is aging.

Sections
Charts — order and placement

Children per woman, India and neighbors

children per woman
TFR

Total fertility rate, India

children per woman

Total fertility rate by religion

children per woman

Population share by religion

% of population

Age pyramid, India

2025 · male (left) / female (right)

people
World Bank population by age and sex. Open full pyramidbirthrate.io

Working-age and retirees, India

millions of people
Working age (15–64)Age 65+

Net migration, India

people

Foreign-born stock by origin, India

people

India-born living abroad

people

Health expenditure, India

% of GDP

Age-dependency ratio, India

%

Share aged 65+, India

%

AI prose uses the same OpenAI key as Cohort — add billing credits at platform.openai.com if generate or Expand fails. Limited to a few memos per hour. You can always type over the text.

This briefing will cover

  • NFHS-5 (2019–21) national TFR is 1.99. Muslim 2.36, Hindu 1.94 — a gap that has narrowed sharply since NFHS-1.
  • State maps (SRS / NFHS) matter more than the religion row for school places and internal migration.
  • A large working-age cohort is a dividend only if jobs and skills absorb it. That is an economic constraint, not a communal slogan.

Working-age counts are modeled from today’s pyramid. 2040 taxpayers are mostly already born; TFR shows up around 2060.